Experience
Mr. Dettman was the law clerk to Justice William G. Callow of the Wisconsin Supreme Court from 1983 to 1984. Mr. Dettman was a commercial litigator at two leading Boston, Massachusetts law firms from 1984 to 1992, providing legal advice in the areas of complex commercial and business disputes, lender liability litigation and associated workouts, insurance coverage disputes, construction disputes, arbitration and litigation, products liability litigation, trademark and copyright, and appellate tax board appeals.
Central Artery/Tunnel Project (Boston, MA)
Mr. Dettman was involved with this $15B project from 1992 to 2005, advancing from Senior Counsel, to Chief Counsel, to Associate Project Director for Claims Resolution. As the project’s lead attorney, he managed all legal matters on the project, including construction claims, design claims, Owner Controlled Insurance Program, alternative dispute resolution, cost recovery, procurement, contract negotiation and administration, inter-governmental relations and agreements, conflicts of interest, ethics, regulatory oversight, labor, employment, building issues, DBE regulations, environmental and right of way litigation, civil and criminal investigations, and legislation.
Becoming Associate Project Director for Claims Resolution in May of 2003, Mr. Dettman managed a 110-person staff and numerous outside consultants. He was responsible for preparing and implementing a negotiation/mediation process to resolve over 5,000 open issues/claims with a claimed value of over $600M. He oversaw the teams that settled out on a global basis several major contracts with claims totaling over $460M using a combination of negotiation and mediation. The list of the contract claims he addressed are on Attachment 1.
ADR Qualifications And Training
Mr. Dettman has received training for and has been accepted on the following panels:
Organization Memberships
Professional Activities
Mr. Dettman has spoken about the use of ADR in the construction industry, including:
§ American Bar Association Section of Public Contract Law Annual Federal Procurement Institute: “Alternative Dispute Resolution at the Central Artery/ Tunnel Project”
§ Construction Management Association of America Annual Conference: “Contrasting ADR Methods”
§ Transportation Research Board Annual Legal Workshop and Annual Conference: “The Partnering and Dispute Resolution Process on the Central Artery/Tunnel Project” and “Using Dispute Review Boards To Prevent And Resolve Disputes”
§ San Francisco and London Superconferences: “The Partnering and Dispute Resolution Process on the Central Artery/Tunnel Project”
§ American Road and Transit Builders Annual Conference: “Alternative Dispute Resolution”
§ Connecticut Bar Association and the Connecticut Society of Civil Engineers: “The Tool Box For Effective Dispute Resolution: ‘Lessons Learned’ From Boston’s Big Dig Project”
§ Federal ADR Working Group: “The Partnering and Dispute Resolution Process on the Central Artery/Tunnel Project”
§ Ohio Transportation and Engineering Conference: “The Ohio Department of Transportation’s Innovative Use of Alternative Dispute Resolution Techniques”
§ Construction Specifications Institute (NH Chapter): “The Toolbox For Effective Dispute Prevention And Resolution On Construction Projects”
§ National Contract Management Association (Boston Chapter): “Managing Claims on Mega-Projects: Lessons Learned From The ‘Big Dig’ Project”
§ Caltrans Contract Law Workshop: “The ‘ADR Tool Box’ for Effective Dispute Avoidance and Resolution”
§ Association For Conflict Resolution Advanced Commercial Mediation Institute: “Mega-Project Mediation: Lessons From Boston’s Big Dig Project”
§ Association For Conflict Resolution Annual Conference: “Taking Consumer Disputes to the Next Level”; “Innovative and Unique Consumer Dispute Resolution Processes”; and “New and Emerging ADR Processes”
§ American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolution Annual Conference: “The Arbitrator Disclosure Conundrum: Establishing Practical Guidelines For Meeting Disclosure Requirements Under The RUAA And Similar Standards”
§ Association For Conflict Resolution Teleseminar: “Report From the Mediation Trenches: Tips From Boston’s “Big Dig” Project Mediation Program”
§ Engineering Society of Detroit ADR Conference: “ADR Lessons From The Trenches: Real-Time Dispute Resolution On The “Big Dig”
§ Transportation Research Board Legal Conference (Moderator): “Protecting the Public Owner in Public Private Partnerships”
§ Dispute Resolution Board Foundation Annual Conference: “Dispute Avoidance and Prevention, Not Just Resolution”
§ Northeast Chapter of the Energy Bar Association Conference: “Reducing Conflict and Bringing Better Decision-Making Processes to New England’s Energy Field”
§ American Bar Association Dispute Resolution Section Annual Conference: ‘“A New Frontier”: Using Innovative Construction ADR Techniques In Other Commercial Fields”
§ Transportation Research Board Annual Legal Workshop and Annual Conference: “Design Build—Where Are We, Where Are We Going?”
§ Energy Bar Association: “Riding the Wave: Exploring the Use of ADR in the New Wave of Renewable, Transmission and Nuclear Construction Projects”
Training Experience
§ Ohio Department of Transportation and the Ohio Contractors Association on the ODOT Dispute Resolution Process
§ Construction Dispute Resolution Services LLC on Arbitration and Dispute Review Board Practice
§ Idaho Transportation Department on Dispute Review Board Practice
§ Dispute Resolution Board Foundation on DRB Administration and Practice
§ Chartered Institute of Arbitrators on Dispute Review Board Practice
§ Ohio Department of Transportation on Dispute Review Board Administration and Practice
Mr. Dettman has also published articles on Dispute Review Board practice in the Dispute Resolution Board Foundation Forum, including “What Role Should Lawyers Play in the DRB Process?”; “’End of the Contract Claims’: Tips for Handling Complex Claims Before the DRB”; “The Use Of ‘Adjudication DRBs’ Where Parties Are Subject To Adjudication Or Arbitration Processes”; “The Role of Dispute Review Boards in Dispute Prevention” and “The Potential Use of Dispute Review Boards (DRBs) Outside the Construction Industry”.
Mr. Dettman also published an article in the Michigan State Bar ADR Quarterly entitled: “Mediators as Settlement Process Chaperones: A New Approach to Resolving Complex, Multi-Party Disputes”.
Mr. Dettman is the co-author of a chapter entitled “Claims, Changes and Disputes” in the forthcoming book on Megaproject management published by the American Consulting Engineers Council.